Jack Young has City Hall’s biggest war chest, most of it from people who don’t live here
Baltimore’s No. 2 elected official cultivates an image of a no-nonsense populist. But his campaign contributions paint a different picture.
Above: Jack Young after a recent Board of Estimates meeting.
For a politician who fashions himself as a man of the people who “aggressively represents the interests of the citizens of Baltimore,” City Council President Bernard C. “Jack” Young sure gets a lot of money from non-Baltimoreans.
In fact, more than 75% of the $161,000 that Young raised last year came from individuals with mailing addresses outside of the city limits. These figures were made available recently in reports to the Maryland Board of Elections. None of Young’s contributions was publicly disclosed by his office or his political campaign managers.
Jack Young holds the second highest elected job in Baltimore after the mayor and presides over both the City Council and the powerful Board of Estimates.
While Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake raises substantially more campaign dollars than Young, she spends a lot of hers, while Young frugally keeps most of his cash stashed away in his election committee.
The result: Young controls the largest political war chest in the city – over $330,000 at the start of 2014, besting the mayor’s own campaign kitty by fully $100,000.
We will write about the mayor’s fundraising habits in an upcoming article. This post, part of The Brew’s on-going series of “Money and Politics in Baltimore,” will focus on the flow of money to Jack Young.
Representing the poor Eastside district around Johns Hopkins Hospital when he first won his Council seat in 1996, Young now has the financial clout to make a credible run for mayor, an ambition the Northern High School graduate clearly harbors.
YOUNG DECLINES TO COMMENT
We submitted these questions to Young about his campaign finances:
• Can you serve the citizens of Baltimore well when you rely so much on campaign cash?
• Why aren’t you reaching out more for contributions by “average” citizens?
• Does the money you receive from contractors and developers in any way influence your decisions on the Board of Estimates or City Council?
• Do such donations give contributors special access to you or your staff?
Young responded through his spokesman Lester Davis:
“The Council President respectfully declines to offer comment for this particular article. He believes that his track record (a defined history of bringing quality jobs to Baltimore, fighting for affordable housing options for city residents, etc.) speaks volumes about his continued commitment to best serving the interests of the citizens of Baltimore.”
Up From Obscurity
A hard-working politician who prides himself on his street savvy, Young is known to travel to scores of community meetings every month to gauge the pulse of the people. His campaign literature touts his common touch and, depending on the audience he stands before, he can employ an easy, empathetic tone.
That’s one Jack Young. The other is an equally tireless seeker of campaign lucre, making calls to potential contributors and working with his treasurer, Keith Tmmons, and campaign advisor, Stephanie Mellinger, to drum up ticket sales at his fundraisers.
Young, now 59, got a late start in politics and was a backbencher until then-Mayor Martin O’Malley began laying the groundwork for his run for governor and Sheila Dixon was president of the City Council.
At the start of 2005, Young had a modest campaign kitty of $29,000, according to financial records on file with the Maryland Board of Elections.
A year later, his coffers had swelled to $72,500 – a 250% increase. Two years after that his political committee boasted $140,000.
By the time Dixon resigned as mayor following her 2009 corruption conviction – paving the way for Young to become City Council president to replace Rawlings-Blake who had ascended to the mayorship – the Eastside Democrat had become a powerful force in the incestuous world of campaign fundraising.
Incestuous because nearly all local politicians go after the same suspects – the contractors, developers and consultants who depend on City Hall business and the small businesses and shop owners that need to stay on the good side of city regulations and inspectors.
Market Stall Owners and Liquor Stores
Young tapped into a tributary of the fundraising stream that had gone largely unnoticed by O’Malley and his protege, Stephanie Rawlings-Blake.
His breakthrough fundraising of 2005-06 came from large contributions from Lexington Market stall owners, Korean-American liquor store owners, up-and-coming parking lot owners and fledgling minority contractors.
There were sizable donations from Lexington [Market] Fried Chicken, Seafood Market, K&C Liquors, PMS Parking and its owner Amsale Geletu, Pennsylvania Avenue shopkeeper Young D. Paik, and the Theo Rodgers-William Lloyd “Little Willie” Adams interests.
What’s more, Young had gained the attention of some influential members of the city’s development community.
Minority contractor Ronald Lipscomb contributed $6,500 Young through RHL Development and Doracon Development of Puerto Rico. John Paterakis, builder of Harbor East who worked with Lipscomb, kicked in $1,500 through H&S Properties Development.
Among others who backed Young with their checkbooks: Timonium-based commercial property owner Thomas Obrecht; real estate attorney Stanley S. Fine; Station North developer Michael Shecter; and Cleveland-based Forest City, the master developer for the EBDI renewal project around Johns Hopkins Hospital.
By holding frequent fundraisers and keeping expenses to a minimum, Young and Timmons had collected a cash balance of over $200,000 when the former assumed the City Council presidency in early 2010.
This new position not only gave Young administrative control of the City Council, but entry into the real power source at City Hall, the Board of Estimates.
PREVIOUS STORIES ON “MONEY AND POLITICS IN BALTIMORE”
• Beatty lavished funds on mayor and City Council as they lavished tax credits on Harbor Point (3/18/14)
• Councilmen say why they accepted donations from developer Beatty (3/24/14)
• Cole brings home the bucks (3/26/14)
• A silent Councilman speaks volumes in his campaign report (4/3/14)
• Council members raised more than $300,000 in 2013 (4/14/14)
Power of the Purse
The Board of Estimates approves all contracts over $25,000 as well as ratifies all federal and state grants, which collectively are worth over $280 million annually.
While the mayor holds the ultimate power of the purse through control of three of the five board seats, the City Council president determines what items appear before the panel – and when.
A review of Young’s campaign records shows how his change in position has altered his fundraising strategy.
While many of his earlier backers still buy tickets to his fundraisers at places like Nick’s Oyster Bar in Federal Hill, his campaign committee, “Friends of Bernard C. Young,” has many new acquaintances.
These include contractors and consultants employed in the rebuilding of the city’s aging sewer and water lines.
The Sewer Gang
New Jersey-based Spiniello Companies gave Young’s campaign $2,000 last year, while R.E. Harrington, a minority sewer contractor, handed over $4,000.
Phoenix Engineering contributed $500. Just last week, Young and the Board of Estimates gave a $69,500 contract to Phoenix for the design of electrical upgrades at the Back River Wastewater Treatment Plant. Transviron, which paid Young $250 last year, won $196,000 worth of work on the same job.
At the February 5 board meeting, Young approved two contracts – worth $21.5 million – to Am-Liner East of Berryville, Va., for improvements to the Herring Run sewershed. Am-Liner contributed $1,250 to Young last year.
On the same Herring Run contracts, R.E. Harrington won $1.83 million.
It should be pointed out that these contracts had gone through the city’s procurement office and were approved by the Bureau of Water and Wastewater before they came before Young and the Board of Estimates. In each case, the approved contractor was designated the lowest responsive bidder.
Young, in other words, did not play an active role in pushing specific contractors through the procurement process. But he did appear to reap the rewards of a system in which contractors are actively solicited for contributions by elected officials who can ultimately approve, or reject, contracts worth millions of dollars.
The Brew’s review of Young’s campaign records found payments from more consultants and contractors involved in city water and sewer contracts.
Among them: Pierre Stewart, a former Rawlings-Blake assistant turned lobbyist for a Cleveland water meter company ($1,000); Valentino T. Bates, owner of an Atlanta-based engineering firm ($1,000); Tejpal Ahuja, a former city water engineer ($1,500); Colorado-based CH2M Hill ($500); and Peter E. Auchincloss, who owns the advisory firm, Watermark Corp., and is chairman of the Parking Authority of Baltimore City ($500).
“Pay to Play” Culture?
In other areas of city business, where lucrative contracts are approved for road paving and parking garage leases, key players have become Young’s “Friends” with four-figure checks.
For example, Christopher McCoy paid $4,000 to Young last year through his construction company and his wife, Ladawn. McCoy has secured millions of dollars in city work at Chapel Green, Orchard Ridge and other “affordable housing” projects.
Four parking garage operators – Parkway Co. of Philadelphia, Edison Properties of Newark, N.J., Greenwald/Arrow Parking and Amsale Geletu of PMS Parking – collectively gave the Young committee over $7,000.
Pless Jones Sr., who recently secured from the Board of Estimates a demolition contract worth up to $15 million, handed over $3,000 to Young through P&J Contracting and National Construction.
Road paver Pierce J. Flanigan IV gave $1,250, while competitor M. Luis handed over four checks totaling $3,500 (just under the total allowable limit for an individual contribution of $4,000).
Liquor and Strip Club Dollars
Liquor store owners did not forget to pay their respects. More than $6,000 flowed into the “Friends” coffers from places like Sherman Liquors, New Q’s Tavern and K&C Liquor.
KAGRO and The Korean American Coalition for Fair Zoning kicked in another $1,000.
The Young campaign received $1,000 from strip club manager Kenneth “Kenny Bird” Jackson under his corporate nom-de-plume, Four One Four. (We have more on Jackson’s contributions to another city councilman here.)
More than $25,000 of the funds raised by Young last year cam from developers.
Among notable contributors: John Paterakis ($2,000 through HELP I LLC); Bozzuto Group ($1,000 under BA Salvage Mill); Carl W. “Bill” Streuver, ($1,000); Henson Development Co. ($1,250); Woda Group/Valhalla Holdings ($2,000); Allen J. Chapman, head of an Alabama-based “affordable housing” builder ($4,000); three principals of the Dawson Group ($1,000); Kenneth R. Banks ($500); Commercial Interiors ($1,000); and Verde Development Group ($500), which is building housing in the EBDI renewal project.
His most notable contribution – never publicly disclosed – came from Beatty Development Group.
Two checks, totaling $2,000, came in March and December 2013 from the developer of Harbor Point, book-ending a long and emotional debate in the City Council over the group’s demand that the city contribute $107 million in tax incentives to build parks, roads and other infrastructure for the Exelon Tower and other buildings on the site.
Young fervently backed the tax incentive package, personally making sure it overcame the legislative hurdles thrown in its path by Taxation Committee chair Carl Stokes. While Councilman Stokes said the TIF allocation was far greater than necessary, guaranteeing the developer an uncommonly high profit margin, Young insisted that the project would bring needed jobs to the city.
In fact, while Young refuses to discuss the campaign contributions he collects, he has stated on many occasions that he views his job as increasing employment opportunities for city residents.
A large percentage of the parties he solicits from, however, don’t live in the city. The Brew’s review found only a relative handful – less than 6% – of total contributions coming from people who (a.) live in Baltimore City and (b.) don’t have an obvious vested interest in city government.
Among those we discounted as disinterested citizens were four members of Young’s own immediate staff who wrote checks worth $450 to his political committee, thus becoming “Friends” with their boss.